Where is Ernie Sirski's loyalty focused?
Without one shadow of doubt, MCGA's
Website states that Ernie Sirksi is on the MCGA election
While each committee member has a legal duty to
know what MCGA is doing in their name, and claims that they did
not know have little merit, can there be any doubt, with all the
previous electoral fiasco's that Ernie Sirksi would not be aware
of the elections rules switched at the last minute, so to say, in
this years election as documented in
the previous section?
In a previous MCGA election under Ernie's watch
as president, the common and widespread knowledge known amongst
the coffee shop talk was that some producers were getting as many
as 5 and 6 ballots. Only after MCGA refused to clean up
their voters list and was then taken to court, some many months
later Ernie had to submit to a cross-examination under oath and
here is what he had to say.
||So did you receive two ballots for the last
||I believe I did.
||Did you vote twice?
||As president, did it give you any concern
||that you received two ballots?
||MS. McCARTHY: I just want to object at this
||point. We are going to confine our
answers to the
||existing list, whether or not we'll provide
the list and
||whether or not we are required to provide
the list. We
||don't want to get into questions about last
||election, because I don't think that's a
For the full context please see the
Within this factual background, please be
further reminded that Ernie Sirski was both a director of UGG and
MCGA president when farmers were set up for the
wide canola basis, including the confiscation of farmers'
right to deliver against the futures and arbitrage the wide basis.
His ties and efforts to help the introduction of
Monsanto's GMO wheat is no longer a secret either as is made known
through public media reports, some of which are available in the
section Does candidate Bruce Dalgarno
deserve your vote?
Now back to the opening question.
Do you have any doubt, with all the previous
electoral fiasco's taking place under Ernie Sirksi watch, that he
would not be aware of the elections rules switched at the last
minute, so to say, in this years election as documented
in the previous section?
Back to top